I started in
Q: What is your creative process like?
It varies. Sometimes I see a trick that I think I could improve upon, or sometimes I take a plot and work on it. Often enough, you see or read something, and play with the concepts for a while, add or subtract, and eventually I may come up with something workable--even if it no longer resembles the trick that I started with. Some times I let ideas percolate--set them aside and come back later. I find my subconscious can make progress even if I am not directly thinking of a trick. Part of the fun for me is to work on stuff --that's the hobby. This new series started several years back; I set a number of requirements for a certain class of tricks. The driving requirement was being clean at the end. Starting there, I focused on the classic areas and tried to work out tricks that met my requirements. At least in a few instances, I succeeded.
Q: Where did the phrase "Fractal card magic" come from?
At the 31 Faces North convention in
In mathematics, a fractal is "an object or quantity that displays self-similarity, in a somewhat technical sense, on all scales. The object need not exhibit exactly the same structure at all scales, but the same "type" of structures must appear on all scales."
In a non-mathematical sense, tricks with fewer cards than the entire deck would exhibit many of the same characteristics, but on a smaller scale. There would be self-similarity in the sense that the same "structures" (such as transpositions, color-changes, divination of selected cards) could exist without needing the entire deck.
Besides, I like how "fractal" sounds. "Fractal card magic" seems like a good trademark-able name for what we used to call packet tricks.
Q: Tell us about the creation of Twisted Sisters.
It was created by playing with one plot and then borrowing from another plot. There is a class of tricks called "small packet brainwave," (like Max Maven's "B'wave.") where a card in a packet is named and the named card is reversed and has a different color back. Then there’s another class I call"small packet card transpositions"; for example, where you might have four red-backed aces and four blue-backed aces, and each named ace transposes to the other packet. There are
Q: Any plans for another book?
Yes. I’m always working on something. Right now my current project has to do with card tricks that begin by having a spectator think of a card, opposed to physically selecting one. Working title, "Mentalissimo." That's all I want to say on that for now.
Q: What suggestions would you give a beginner who wants to start in magic?
The obvious answer is to read as much as possible. I believe that even if you’re just doing someone else’s tricks, there’s still a creative process, in order to do things in your own way. The best way to make that happen is to read and learn all sorts of different ways. The more you learn, the more things connect. The more connections, the more of a network you have to bounce around in. The larger the network, the deeper your understanding will be. The more you know, the better you’ll be, even if you don’t perform all of it.
So the most important thing is to take it seriously, study, and learn as much as you can. These days a lot of people would rather watch than read, and while there is a place for video, but I think you get more from a well-written book than a well-produced DVD. That's why I insisted the FCM trilogy each contain a downloadable e-book. The other thing is to perform. You really will not understand a lot about magic unless you do.
2 comments:
John's new Royal Scam is wonderful! Simple plot, simple props, and (John's goal) clean ending!
John, we all look forward to seeing more from you in Minnesota at the Close-Up convention.
Don Bursel
My brother recommended I might like this web site. He was entirely right. This post actually made my day. You cann't imagine simply how much time I had spent for this information! Thanks!
Post a Comment